A bad case of swine flu

The maladies afflicting West Virginia’s research infrastructure moved beyond the dermatalogical (see“Marketing 101: The Subcutaneous World of New Media”) to the porcine this week as Wheeling Jesuit University’s Board of Trustees, which is made up of Jesuit clergy, fired its president Rev. Julio Giuletti after the school’s Board of Directors could not generate the two-thirds vote needed to accomplish the feat.  This all was done while Father Giuletti was on vacation.

What’s going on?  In part, it relates to a NASA Office of Inspector General’s report alleging that WJU misspent millions of dollars in federal grant funds.  As I understand it, the Inspector General accuses WJU of, among other things, double-dipping – charging more than 100% of people’s salaries to a grant.  The allegations surround spending for the institution’s Robert C. Byrd National Technology Transfer Center (NTTC).

NTTC was established in 1989 to link federal labs and universities with technologies to industries that might be able to use them.  Stop right there and ask yourself a question: Why on earth would a National Technology Transfer Center be located at Wheeling Jesuit University and not at or near a major research university or at the very least at West Virginia University if located in West Virginia?

The first hint is at the beginning of the Center’s name: United States Senator Robert C. Byrd.  Senator Byrd, who considers the moniker “King of Pork” a badge of honor, has long had a very close relationship with Father Thomas Acker, one of WJU’s previous presidents (they’ve gone through quite a few lately), and he arranged to have NTTC located at WJU because of that relationship.

While we in West Virginia are proud of our Senior Senator’s ability to bring home the bacon, we should ask ourselves: At what cost?  Should a small institution like WJU be put in charge of a National Technology Transfer Center?  How will WJU, which was already struggling financially (if a reporter did some digging, he or she might find some interesting correspondence from the United States Department of Education on this subject), survive as it tries to pay NASA back millions of dollars misspent funds?

The assault on The Academy continues – this time in an op-ed commentary by Dr. Robert Zemsky, another person generally regarded as a nut case by The Academy, in the Chronicle of Higher Education.  What is the latest barbarian at The Academy’s gates saying?

The history of American higher education is well supplied with reform movements that have gone nowhere.  Despite fervent calls for change in a number of areas, most often issued by a commission with an impressive masthead, nothing much happens – or worse, the only visible result is hurt feelings and a hunkering down by the college leaders on whom change depends.

Of all the groups I have dealt with over the years, higher education is the most resistant to change, which may seem counter-intuitive given that The Academy is supposed to be all about thinking the great thoughts.  But it is about precisely that – thinking, not changing.

Like outside reformers, state agencies cannot prescribe change (unless they are prepared for a long, exhausting battle) but must create the conditions that make change possible… The nature of the academy sucks the air out of piecemeal reforms.

More than anyone in West Virginia higher education over the last few years, I was involved in those lll-ooo-nnn-ggg, exhausting battles with the Death Eaters and have two observations.  First, don’t focus primarily on trying to build consensus from within The Academy.  You’ll accomplish more by hitting your head against a wall repeatedly.  Second, you really can create the conditions that make change possible – just look at how West Virginia’s community college system has been transformed over the last 5 years (a subject for some future blog posts, I suspect).

… and most important …

The problem, as the economist Richard Vedder and others have noted, is that the classic rules of supply and demand apply at best imperfectly to higher education. In a market so awash with federal money—for research support, for grants and loans to students and parents—competitive pressures aren’t sufficient to change the system.

That’s the real issue: there is little change – and tuition costs are going through the roof – because The Academy is very well insulated from the effects of the market.  In my experience, the two higher education groups most receptive to change – academic research and community colleges - actually prove the rule.  Why?  They are expected to be entrepreneurial and address real-world concerns.  If they do not, their “business” models do not work very well.  Over time, we will follow the money … and thus gain a better understanding of higher education’s strengths and weaknesses.

Tagged with:  

Am I big brother?

What do I know about you?

  • Almost every day exactly 2 of you access my blog by typing “dennis taylor” in a search engine. Why do you not use capital letters?
  • Every day at least 10 and sometimes a lot more of you access my blog through my business website.  Why do you not access it directly?
  • Every day more than 30 of you access my blog using an RSS feed.  Why have you chosen sprezzatura!?
  • Every day several of you access my blog from the link on Fifth Column.  Why?  I do not have Josh’s penchant for profanity, and while we both have a flair for writing, our styles are very different.
  • Almost every day someone discovers my blog for the first time … and reads post after post after post.
  • Some poor schmuck recently found my blog while looking for information about psoriasis.  Others discover my blog using some very bizarre search terms.

More tidbits:

  • As a group, you are far more interested in research (or possibly dermatology) than in the financial services industry.  But that doesn’t mean I’m going to stop posting on the latter subject.
  • As a group, you rarely follow the links to other resources that I provide within my posts.
  • If you click on any link from my blog, it’s likely to be the link to my business website.
  • More of you read my blog while at work than at home – and some of you, like my former co-workers, are daring enough to access my blog despite having your computer monitored by your employer.

Still more tidbits:

  • If you leave a comment, I often can figure out your general location or more even if you don’t use your real name or provide an email address.
  • If you leave a comment, I can edit it to correct a typo or make it say something completely different.

Big Brother is watching!

Tagged with:  

I have had two interesting experiences with new media lately.

  • Several months ago, I posted a comment on Facebook stating that I had gotten my law license back.  (Don’t jump to conclusions!  I just changed my status from “active but not practicing” to “active and practicing” because I wanted to be able to do legal work again.)  In response to a friend’s comment, I explained that I did not have to retake the West Virginia bar exam to get my law license back and I didn’t know if I could pass it now.  The next thing I knew I was seeing an advertisement for a bar review course on Facebook.  Why?  The reference to the bar exam?  My profile, which indicates that I have a JD degree?  Both?
  • As I mentioned yesterday, I just made the conversion from NetNewsWire to Google Reader for RSS feeds.  On the right side of my RSS feed home page is a light blue box containing RSS feeds in which Google “thinks” I may be interested.  At the top of the list?  Dermatology Times, which promotes itself as the leading news magazine for dermatologists.  I promise you I have no unusual rashes or break-outs, so why would Google “think” I might be interested?  Well I have written two posts lately in which I used dermatological wordplay – “Heartbreak of Psoriasis” – about the dermatologist anchor tenant in Huntington’s Kinetic Park – and “Chemical Peel, Anyone?” – about the South Charleston Tech Center, which used to be the nation’s most significant chemicals research facility – that appeared in my Google Reader display.  Furthermore, in the process of drafting an upcoming post about the WVU Research Park, I went looking for another dermatological term for punmanship purposes.  As a result, apparently, Google “thinks” I may want an RSS feed to Dermatology Times.

This type of marketing troubles me.  Will Big Brother ultimately be able to figure out my every want and desire and lead me straight to it, which would not be a good thing, I assure you?  Or should I take comfort that Facebook’s marketing arm works so poorly it “thinks” I’m studying for the bar exam and Google’s marketing arm works so poorly it “thinks” I’m a dermatologist?

Tagged with:  

Over the last few months, I have had an opportunity to discover social (and anti-social) media – or more accurately, it has discovered me.  I increasingly am convinced that it truly is changing the world.  Some observations about the various media that have discovered me:

  • Blogs.  Not too many years ago, I remember someone informing me that a former co-worker (HippieKiller) had a blog and my asking what exactly a blog was.  Today, I write this blog and read seven blogs regularly via RSS feed.  I had thought technology was going to make writing a dying art.  The rise of blogging suggests otherwise.  I like it that most bloggers, or at least the ones I read, do not disguise their opinions like traditional media often do.  If they think something is BS, they call it BS.  The world is a better place because of that.  Plus you can incorporate video, pictures and audio – not that you would know that from reading my blog.
  • Facebook. I’m convinced Facebook, the main social networking site, has changed relationships and social networking forever.  No longer will people lose contact with high school and college classmates or business and social acquaintances.  Facebook allows us to stay just well enough informed about people we’d never pick up the phone to call.  Additionally, Facebook is a wonderful tool for non-profit organizations.  I love to read about the activities of the non-profits with which I am or have been involved, and I’m sure it makes me more likely to donate when I’m reminded regularly of the great work these groups do.  Having said all that, I’ll never understand the attraction of Mafia Wars, Farmville, or quizzes; people with too much time on their hands, I guess.
  • LinkedIn. I’d never heard of LinkedIn, the main business networking site, before a friend invited me to join a few months ago.  They have a tool that allows you to figure out how many of your address book contacts are LinkedIn members.  I was blown away to discover that 194 were.  Of course, I’ve never done anything other than sign up, which probably defeats the purpose.
  • MeetUp. Unless you’re interested in joining Kanawha Valley Hookers (a now-defunct group for crocheting, I quickly and sadly discovered) or becoming a charter member of the John Birch Society, don’t waste your time – yet.
  • RSS Feeds. How did I ever live without them?  Now I can choose which news I want to check out regularly and it’s all brought to me in one place.  I was just forced to make the move from NetNewsWire to GoogleReader.  I think both are fabulous tools.
  • StumbleUpon. For those who love serendipity and voyages of discovery, there’s no place better than StumbleUpon, which learns what you like and helps you discover more of it, or one of its competitors.  I think it’s the perfect accompaniment to an RSS Feed when you have some free time to look for interesting things.
  • iTunes. Now that I know the difference between an iPod, an iPhone, and iTunes, I’ve discovered I’m happiest with iTunes.  I never watch regular television anymore.  I buy a season of a TV show that I’ve heard is good through i-Tunes and watch episode after episode over nights and weeks.  Good television is so much better when you watch episodes back to back – and without commercial interruption.  The only problem: there’s no one with whom to discuss your latest episode of Battlestar Galactica or Mad Men – they either watched it six months ago or haven’t seen it.
  • Twitter. Ever trying to keep up with the latest, I established a Twitter account.  I have not tweeted once.  The only good use I can come up with for it: alerting someone to a good article or blog post, but who really wants to deal with tinyurl.com?  (But isn’t it cool that someone thought of tinyurl to meet a need.)  They say brevity is the soul of wit; I say it’s the soul of twits and twitterers.
  • YouTube and Flickr.  Not places I visit regularly.
  • Websites.  They’re coming to seem a bit old-fashioned (unless you call them portals and charge a lot for them).  I do not understand why so many people spend so much money on them and then fail to keep them updated.  (Note to self: Finish website.)
Tagged with:  
CONTACT

© 2010 DCT Advisors LLC
Post Office Box 224
3288 Winfield Road
Winfield, West Virginia 25213
Phone: 304.541.0332
Fax: 866.783.0511
Email: dct@dctadvisors.com

text

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

THIS IS NOT A LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT. DCT Advisors performs exclusively non-legal work. The materials on this website have been prepared for informational purposes and are not legal advice, nor do they create a lawyer-client relationship.