… in higher education it appears.  Of the 392 colleges and universities who signed the American College and University Presidents Climate Commitment in 2007, only 88 fulfilled their commitment by submitting climate action plans by the 15 September deadline.

The commitment, which seeks to reduce our nation’s college campuses’ carbon footprints, initially was signed by schools representing 1/3 of America’s college students.  I was not surprised to discover that only one West Virginia public institution, Bridgemont Community and Technical College, which is doing quite a bit of education and training in the clean energy and environmental fields, was a signatory, even though it did not meet the deadline.  Bethany College and American Public University System, which is headquartered in Charles Town and provides education primarily to the military and online, were West Virginia’s other signatories.

Since the latter part of the 19th century, West Virginia has been at the forefront of American energy production.  Will this continue?

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) contains billions and billions of dollars aimed at bringing about a “green revolution.”  If some of these initiatives are successful, they truly could revolutionize American and world energy production and consumption.  To help you understand the dramatic scope of the federal green investment, I have provided a partial list of initiatives below:

Department of Energy:

  • Advanced Research Projects Agency Energy (ARPA-E).  To foster research and development of transformational energy-related technologies.
  • Smart Grid Investments.  To improve electricity delivery and energy reliability.
  • Nuclear Science and Technology.  To pursue forefront nuclear science research.
  • Early Career Research.  To support energy researchers who are early in their careers.
  • Alternative Isotope Production Techniques.  To seek breakthroughs that will facilitate an increased supply of isotopes that are in short supply.
  • Integrated Biorefinery Operations.  To create biofuels and bioproducts refineries that can use a variety of feedstocks effectively.
  • Energy Efficient Information and Communication Technology.  To reduce the energy use of technology equipment.
  • Enhanced Geothermal Systems.  To improve energy extraction from geothermal sites and use of ground source heat pumps.
  • Hydroelectric Facility Modernization.  To improve hydroelectric power production.
  • Wind Turbine Drivetrains.  To design and construct a facility to test wind turbine drive trains.
  • Wind Energy Consortia.  To develop consortia between higher education institutions and the wind industry.
  • Advanced Energy Efficient Building Technology.  To support a wide range of research and development concerning energy efficient buildings.
  • Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing.  To increase production of batteries and electric drive components.
  • Truck Engines/Powertrains.  To improve truck engine energy efficiency.

Department of Labor:

  • Energy Training Partnerships.  To provide training and placement services in energy efficiency and renewable energy industries.
  • Green Capacity Building.  To build capacity of training programs to meet the needs of expanding green industries.
  • State Energy Sector Partnerships.  To develop and implement a green energy sector workforce plan.
  • State Labor Market Information Improvement Grants.  To improve data collection concerning energy efficiency and renewable energy industries.

Other:

  • Department of Transportation – TIGGER.  To reduce greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption of public transportation systems.
  • Environmental Protection Agency.  To promote diesel emission reductions.

So where will the green revolution, if there truly is to be one, leave West Virginia?  The answer may depend on how quickly we can turn our hills and valleys green.  We’ll explore possible answers – and tie them into our Socratic analysis of mountaintop removal coal mining – over the coming weeks and months.

Tagged with:  

I’m not one of those Americans who wants to change the name of French fries to Freedom fries any time a foreigner offers an opinion of or says something critical of the United States.  That is why I am a fan of the Economist.

This week the Economist includes an opinion piece about President Barack Obama.  My favorite quotation:  ”He has been curiously ill-served by a press short of useful criticism, with liberal America prepared only to debate what sort of water he walks on best, while conservative radio hosts argue over when exactly he became a communist.”  I can come up with no sentence that better captures the left-right media divide – and the utter uselessness of their chatter – better.

Meanwhile, notes the Economist, President Obama is losing the support of independent voters, who are concerned about federal spending, and needs to show leadership on important issues like health care and environmental reform.  ”Back in the honeymoon days,” says the Economist, “Mr. Obama was constantly compared to Roosevelt.  No longer.”

I recently had an opportunity to read FDR’s fireside chats.  FDR would talk directly to the American people about important issues in plain, easy to understand, but not condescending, language.  I think President Obama needs to do more of this.  It’s harder now, with so many media competing for our limited attentions, but he needs to make a conscientious effort to reach us.

In closing, some interesting words from FDR to ponder:

  • On stimulus spending: “It is going to cost something to get out of this recession this way but the profit of getting out of it will pay for the cost several times over. Lost working time is lost money. Every day that a workman is unemployed, or a machine is unused, or a business organization is marking time, it is a loss to the Nation.”  14 April 1938.
  • On health care: “Whether we come to this form of insurance soon or later on, I am confident that we can devise a system which will enhance and not hinder the remarkable progress which has been made and is being made in practice of the professions of medicine and surgery in the United States.”  14 November 1936.
  • On the environment: “If, for example, in some local area the water table continues to drop and the topsoil to blow away, the land values will disappear with the water and the soil. People on the farms will drift into the nearby cities; the cities will have no farm trade and the workers in the city factories and stores will have no jobs. Property values in the cities will decline. If, on the other hand, the farms within that area remain as farms with better water supply and no erosion, the farm population will stay on the land and prosper and the nearby cities will prosper too. Property values will increase instead of disappearing.”  6 September 1936.
Tagged with:  
Page 2 of 212
CONTACT

© 2010 DCT Advisors LLC
Post Office Box 224
3288 Winfield Road
Winfield, West Virginia 25213
Phone: 304.541.0332
Fax: 866.783.0511
Email: dct@dctadvisors.com

text

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

THIS IS NOT A LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT. DCT Advisors performs exclusively non-legal work. The materials on this website have been prepared for informational purposes and are not legal advice, nor do they create a lawyer-client relationship.