The other students

Community College Times reports that Louisiana lawmakers are preparing to enact legislation to create a second “career option” high school diploma for students.  Under the legislation, parents could allow students 15 years-old or older to skip out of the pre-college curriculum.  If they did and earned a “career option” diploma, they could attend community college, but not a four-year college or university.

Many education organizations, including AchieveEducation Trust, and Jobs for the Future, oppose this legislation.  Why?  Two reasons:  First, there is substantial education research about the benefits of a rigorous academic curriculum.  Indeed, it is one of the best predictors of later academic (and logically economic?) success.  These groups suspect the “career option” will be anything but rigorous.  Second, these groups worry that poor students will take the “career option” and find themselves unprepared for good careers down the road.

But is every student truly “traditional” college material?  What happens to that student for whom the “traditional” college track is not working?  Does he or she drop out before graduating high school?  How do you maximize that student’s future career options?

One possible answer being explored nationally is early college or middle college.  Middle college places struggling high school students on a college campus for a combined high school/college experience.  The theory is that certain struggling students can succeed if presented with a different environment and a different approach to education.

West Virginia Northern Community College is in the process of launching a middle college for West Virginia high school students.  WVNCC President Martin Olshinsky’s efforts to make middle college a reality for Northern Panhandle students should be applauded … supported financially … evaluated rigorously … and transplanted elsewhere IF the model proves successful.

Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Education issued a “meta-analysis” of online learning studies.  Being a bit of a Luddite despite spending years dealing with higher education technology issues, I always suspected that online learning was inferior to in-person learning.  Not so, says the Department of Education.  The Department concludes that students in online learning environments generally perform better than do students receiving face-to-face instruction, and students in classes that combine both online and face-to-face instruction do even better.  One thing I know for sure: It takes much more time to prepare for and teach online courses than it does to teach regular classes, which could explain some of the positive correlation.

Most surprising, though, is that despite identifying more than 1,000 studies of online learning, the U.S. Department of Education could not find enough quality studies to draw meaningful conclusions about online learning in the K-12 schools.  Given all the money spent on technology at the K-12 level, this is a stunning finding.  In West Virginia, the State alone will spend approximately $22.85 million for technology at the K-12 level during the next fiscal year, and this does not include additional local and federal funding.  West Virginia is not alone in spending significant amounts of money on technology and online learning.

The study does not address cost or the counter-intuitive fact that online learning often costs more than face-to-face learning.

Of twitter and twits

A follow-up to the Divided Government post:

In Iran people have taken to the streets and Twitter to fight for democratic principles.  In New York?  In West Virginia?

Is this what all the fighting’s for?  I hope not.

Tagged with:  

Charter schools

During the recently concluded session, West Virginia legislators debated the pros and cons of charter schools and ultimately passed a bill during the special session approving a bastardized version of charter schools called innovation zones.  The folks at Create West Virginia were particularly strong proponents of the innovation zones/charter schools legislation.

I hope everyone involved reads the new report from the Stanford University Center for Research on Educational Outcomes about the (in)effectiveness of charter schools.  The report, which has received a lot of attention nationally, found that 17 percent of charter schools performed significantly better than traditional public schools, 46 percent performed about the same and 37 percent performed significantly worse.  While far from dispositive, the report suggests that a lot of charter schools are not only not better, but actually worse, than traditional public schools.

Interestingly, the study was funded by charter school proponents.

 

22 June 2009.  For additional reading and listening:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/22/education/22duncan.html

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105461724&ft=1&f=1013

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105461713&ft=1&f=1013

Tagged with:  
Page 3 of 3123
CONTACT

DCT Advisors LLC
3288 Winfield Road
Post Office Box 224
Winfield, West Virginia 25213
Phone: 304.541.0332
Fax: 866.783.0511
Email: dct@dctadvisors.com

text

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

THIS IS NOT A LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT. DCT Advisors performs exclusively non-legal work. The materials on this website have been prepared for informational purposes and are not legal advice, nor do they create a lawyer-client relationship.