Of twitter and twits

A follow-up to the Divided Government post:

In Iran people have taken to the streets and Twitter to fight for democratic principles.  In New York?  In West Virginia?

Is this what all the fighting’s for?  I hope not.

Tagged with:  

In conjunction with West Virginia Day, Jason Keeling has challenged bloggers to identify an obstacle that hinders West Virginia and discuss its solution.

The Obstacle 

West Virginia’s county and city governments have little in the way of financial resources to address community needs.  Unlike many other states, West Virginia strictly limits the methods and amounts of funds that counties, cities and towns can raise to support community initiatives.  Making the situation worse, many cities like Huntington and Charleston face overwhelming long-term public safety employee pension liabilities that have further limited their abilities to address community needs and have placed these cities on the verge of bankruptcy.

The Obvious Solution

Give counties, cities and towns state tax revenue or greater flexibility to generate local tax revenue so they can address community needs, and have the state assume responsibility for all or a significant part of city pension liabilities.  For reasons too numerous to address here, there are serious problems with these proposals and political reasons why they are unlikely to be implemented.

The Not-So-Obvious Solution

Is there a not-so-obvious solution?  The experience of Create Huntington suggests that there is.  

In law school, students learn about “the tragedy of the commons.”  If a person gets all or most of  the benefit of an improvement and the benefit outweighs the cost, she will make the improvement.  If, on the other hand, she gets only a small benefit from an improvement, she will not make that improvement even if the benefit to the larger community vastly outweighs its cost.  This is a basic justification for both private property rights and government and explains why a homeowner takes better care of property than does a renter.  The tragedy of the commons also provides a partial explanation for why many community initiatives struggle to sustain themselves over time.

Recognizing that the City of Huntington is unlikely to be able to address significant community needs effectively in light of it current budget situation, a group calling itself Create Huntington has stepped up to the plate to address those needs, bring about sustainable change and turn the theory of the tragedy of the commons on its head.  Create Huntington started in 2006 as an effort by a group of concerned citizens to discuss the best way to improve Huntington’s economic future.  Over the last three years, Create Huntington has developed a strategic plan that identifies a series of domains in which it wants to have a positive impact: health and well-being, community infrastructure, development resources, culture and quality of life, natural resources, social capital, image and attitude and system effectiveness.

But Create Huntington has done far more than plan.  It has inspired significant numbers of Huntingtonians to become involved in community projects.  Through the Adopt YOUR Block – Be a Litter-Gitter project, more than 1500 volunteers have promised to keep the block on which they live litter-free.  The Huntington Area Revitalization Coalition has planted flowers and removed graffiti and debris.  Various groups are working to promote the arts by creating a downtown art gallery, having more live music in the streets, holding a riverfront craft festival and promoting Huntington as a film destination.  The list goes on and on.

How has Create Huntington, which has no complex bureaucracy and almost no money, done this?

  • By inspiring its citizens to imagine what Huntington can be and to take action to turn that vision into a reality.
  • By soliciting the ideas of community members in meaningful ways through community meetings, surveys and summits.
  • By bringing community members together weekly for “Chat ‘n Chews” where people can discuss ways to help improve Huntington.

Create Huntington offers a model for other West Virginia communities whose governments have little in the way of resources and whose citizens seek positive change.

Charter schools

During the recently concluded session, West Virginia legislators debated the pros and cons of charter schools and ultimately passed a bill during the special session approving a bastardized version of charter schools called innovation zones.  The folks at Create West Virginia were particularly strong proponents of the innovation zones/charter schools legislation.

I hope everyone involved reads the new report from the Stanford University Center for Research on Educational Outcomes about the (in)effectiveness of charter schools.  The report, which has received a lot of attention nationally, found that 17 percent of charter schools performed significantly better than traditional public schools, 46 percent performed about the same and 37 percent performed significantly worse.  While far from dispositive, the report suggests that a lot of charter schools are not only not better, but actually worse, than traditional public schools.

Interestingly, the study was funded by charter school proponents.

 

22 June 2009.  For additional reading and listening:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/22/education/22duncan.html

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105461724&ft=1&f=1013

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105461713&ft=1&f=1013

Tagged with:  

Divided government

On Friday the Charleston Gazette ran one of its periodic editorials lampooning southern West Virginia politics as a result of former Delegate Joe C. Ferrell’s indictment.  And today the Charleston Daily Mail ran one of its periodic editorials praising “divided government.”  ”One of the charms of divided government,” says the Daily Mail editorial, “is that those in power know they will be closely watched by those who are out of power.  This tends to restrain abuses, and thus to protect the public.”

It is a ironic that the Gazette is lampooning southern West Virginia politics and the Daily Mail is singing the praises of divided government during a week that has seen one of the grandest exhibitions of back-room politics and divided government gone awry – not in West Virginia but in New York State.

After the most recent statewide election, Democrats found themselves in control of the New York State Senate by the narrowest of margins – 32 to 30.  As a result, two fine Democrats saw opportunity and decided to align themselves with Republicans.  The first fine Democrat Pedro Espada previously was fined more than $60,000 for failing to disclose campaign contributions; a non-profit group he founded is under investigation for using misappropriated money; and there are even questions about whether he resides in the district he represents.  The second Democrat Hiram Monserrate currently is under indictment for assaulting someone with a piece of broken glass and was elected to the State Senate only after retiring from the New York Police Department because a psychological disability prevented him from performing his job.  Equally amusing, the Republican coup was orchestrated by a billionaire Democrat who was mad at State Senators for raising his taxes.

Because of these power struggles, New York Senate Democrats have sued Senate Republicans and locked them out of the Senate chambers while important issues like control of the New York City public school system remain unresolved.  The next time the Gazette or Daily Mail waxes poetic about southern West Virginia political wrongs or the charms of divided government, it needs to look outside of West Virginia because southern West Virginia is not unique, and divided government is not always charming.

Page 4 of 41234
CONTACT

© 2010 DCT Advisors LLC
Post Office Box 224
3288 Winfield Road
Winfield, West Virginia 25213
Phone: 304.541.0332
Fax: 866.783.0511
Email: dct@dctadvisors.com

text

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

THIS IS NOT A LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT. DCT Advisors performs exclusively non-legal work. The materials on this website have been prepared for informational purposes and are not legal advice, nor do they create a lawyer-client relationship.